by
Obododịmma ọha
The politics of otherness is conceived in Igbo
thought as deploying secret strategies to make the other unknowingly reveal a
plan that is hidden. One of these secret strategies is understood as ịdụ mmadụ olu (or literally, “prodding one’s voice)! Why is a plan seen as “ voice”? Is
it a culture that looks at things from the angle of sound or sense as an
interface with the object of the sound linked to it. ịdụ mmadụ olu thus
suggests an awareness that it is not everything that is openly stated something
and one must dig deeper to find out more. Finding out more may be done with
inferences made from what a subject says or through direct revelation through
confession or exposure. We can see immediately that it is very relevant to
indigenous intelligence gathering and that local Africans have always had
interesting techniques of intelligence work that should not be ignored in
fishing for Western ideas.
ịdụ mmadụ olu reminds one of a risky coil you
only prod and it unwinds and comes careering out or an inducement to give out
information. Whatever may be case, ịdụ mmadụ olu is a form of spying on the
other's plans in order to know the most effective way to act. In other words,
it feeds on discourse, on performed interaction, to break through a barrier.
But it is also a skill and people scheming and
making sure a subject does not suspect this prodding till the action
forestalling it is taken. That is to say that some people are gifted with this
researching with the other and fact-finding. It is like making one bear witness
against oneself. Yes; the one doing the prodding is a sneaky researcher
watching out for suggestives.
I called
it a skill, in fact, a life skill and manifestation of cleverness, because
everyone is supposed to know when and how to carry it out or when someone else
is prodding one’s voice to find something out. We are supposed, as rational humans,
to have the intelligence to know when this prodding is being carried out and
how to handle it. Indeed, it is an important training on discourse engagement
one should get from one’s parents in the home. Sometimes we make the mistake of
thinking that there is no training for certain areas of life like sexual life,
discourse and discourse participation in the culture, etc. No! There is.
The training may be dispensed in the
home, age-group meeting, the ụmụnna meeting (meeting of the kinsmen), farming
practices, communal handling of mishap affecting a kinsperson (as when the roof
of the house is blown off by the windstorm and must be immediately and
collectively repaired), other communal tasks (like weeding and sweeping road
networks and village square, etc. In that case, one who exempts self from such,
maybe because of church activities or elite snobbishness, one is denying self a
very vital form of cultural education not available in formal schooling!
It is an art of cleverness which ancient Igbo thinkers used in clandestine knowing. Implicitly, the prodders derive the
information from inferences and not always from direct expression. In that
case, the prodder must arm self with techniques of indirect investigation and
not expect an easy catch. It gets even more risky and problematic if the person
whose voice is being prodded is suspicious or on guard. In other words, both
the prodder and the prodded have matching skills on prodding; you know what I
know or as it said in Igbo: “Ihe nne gị gwara gị, nne nke m gwakwara a ya”
(That thing your mother told you, my own mother also told me that); so, there
is a dilemma. Both prodder and the prodded have had sound cultural education
and share knowledge on prodding. So, relax! You are playing with a big boy!
Perhaps one should also comment on prodding and
individual disposition and its implications for a wider societal experience.
First, disposition. Prodders select their targets carefully as students of
human behaviour. Any person who is given to voluptuousness when given a glass
of wine is a sure specimen.That means prodding when the person is not on guard
or has relaxed guard. What makes us relax our guard like tipsiness? Anyone that
is tipsy has lost control of self, including the mouth. Just as the drunkard
may vomit the excess wine, the drunkard can also vomit a plan through unguarded
talk. So, prodders may want to work on their targets through the frothing cup.
Some people may however drink to excess and
behave as if they have lost control. But, No! It is even that time that they
are dangerous with their own prodding! Believe that they are drunk at your own
risk. In other words, such people are merely acting, and which acting is more
successful than the one that convinces us that it is natural or real? In other
words, it fools us into thinking that fiction is reality!
Apart from drunkards who may be vulnerable,
people who naturally talk a lot, or who are fond of praising their efforts, rua
big risk of falling to prodders. When one talks a lot, one may not be
monitoring what one has said or may not know when one has taken a dangerous
plunge!There is always a precipice waiting for us in when we open our mouths,
and what does a prodder want badly than for us to open our mouths? Prodders can
even prod through close friends who would make us soften and open our mouths
eventually. So; every close friend is actually a necessary risk!
People who boast or are angry are already given to
unnecessary opening of the mouth. When they boast about themselves or want
others to see what they possess, they are making themselves vulnerable. Angry people, too, lose control of their emotions and even say what they would later regret! Generally, it is dangerous to confide in people who talk or boast a lot. Just
as taciturn people may also become targets, because the idea is their their
closed mouths are hiding or shielding something. Let’s get that thing!
But as the Igbo say, A mara nwoke, amaghị uche
ya (One may know a man, but may not know his thoughts). Indeed, one basic
training on ultra-manhood in ancient Igbo culture is the keeping of secrets.
That was why Igbo ancestors joined secret societies. Joining the mmanwụ society
when one was of age was an important
training for every male child on the keeping of the sacred secret signification
of the mmanwụ. In fact, ịma mmanwụ, the
initiation into the mmanwu, literally meant “knowing the mmanwụ”. And knowing the
mmanwụ meant knowing the sacred secret signification of the mmanwụ. The knowledge
of this clandestine semiotics of the mmanwụ is a means of discriminating
between the initiate and the non-initiate, as I have observed in another blog
article. Manhood and secrecy are therefore placed side-by-side in the culture.
This explains one problem manhood touched by Western elitism is experiencing.
Modern Western elitism makes a man live out his oneness with his wife and tells
her everything for her to Delilah him when she wants. Using him as we use the
remote controller is just a small thing. A man locked in embrace with his dear
wife and who has lost his head in kissing her cannot wake up early and attend a
village meeting or reach out for his egwugwu when bad people come in the night.
By the way, why should he wake up? Are angels not on guard?
Obviously, prodding somebody to give it out has always had wider implications for society. From mask dancing to soldiery and defence of community, careless talker are a great risk. When the fate of society hangs on them or they are given leadership roles, the society is in big trouble. It is doubtful if the gains scored by Boko Haram terrorists are not started by insiders who are prodders about counter-plans. The mole may be an insider, but more dangerously a prodded. Further, if the prodded is susceptible, there is also a big problem. A clever prodder needs a vulnerable to succeed.
Obviously, prodding somebody to give it out has always had wider implications for society. From mask dancing to soldiery and defence of community, careless talker are a great risk. When the fate of society hangs on them or they are given leadership roles, the society is in big trouble. It is doubtful if the gains scored by Boko Haram terrorists are not started by insiders who are prodders about counter-plans. The mole may be an insider, but more dangerously a prodded. Further, if the prodded is susceptible, there is also a big problem. A clever prodder needs a vulnerable to succeed.
Indeed,
as the Igbo say, “E meghee ọnụ, a hụ uche” (When the mouth is opened, we see
what one is thinking). As I reflect on ịdụ mmadụ olu in my office, it dawns on
me that , as we theorize discourse in today’s classroom, fascinated with
Western theorists whose works we have read, we should try a little bit to
localize discourse and explore trajectories that our students need to know as people
growing up in African societies.
Comments