By
Obododimma
Oha
The Igbo use the
proverb, Ihe kwuru, ihe akwuso ya
(literally, “Something stands beside something"). That something that stands
beside it is its complement, as well as its alternative. There are always other
alternatives, other routes. If there are no alternatives, there is a problem.
We are left with no option and must accept or deal with what is available. That
zero-option is an example of absolute tyranny, and when it is introduced in
discourse, you can be sure that silence would result. Since people are not
allowed to look at the issue from other angles, the only thing for them is to
follow what they object to, what they cannot in their right senses accept, or
to keep quiet and continue to gnash their teeth! In that case, you can see that
silence is not always golden, not always an assurance that the silent person
does not want to talk.
Is it not interesting
that that thing standing beside something is not just an antagonist? As an
option, an alternative, it is its replacement. But it is not quite reasonable
to think of a replacement as an erasure, complete removal, obliteration, of the
other. That thing standing beside that thing is that thing in a fuller sense;
it is its complementation. That thing is always incomplete without that thing
standing beside it. That thing standing beside it is necessary to its
existence, even for the clarity of what it really is or stands for. Semanticists
tell us that contrast of pairs enables the realization of the meaning of words.
If there is no death, I doubt that you would more clearly understand what life
is. A contrast is tied up with the ontology of things, even ideas. A contrast
is needed to complete the sense.
Ihe
kwuru, ihe akwuso ya! If one thing does not want us to
understand it and to scrutinize it, it should not come forward at all. It
should not stand. Even when something sits, another thing is sitting beside it.
That thing standing or sitting beside something helps us to think beyond the
thing just standing or sitting. The besideness is sought by a people that wish
to think deeply, not a people for whom others do the thinking.
Man standing beside
woman;
Life standing beside
death;
Approach standing
beside retreat;
Night standing beside
day;
Speaking standing
beside Listening;
And so on.
Even when
one type of speaking stands, another stands beside it. Same for one type of
listening and one type of writing! Ihe
kwuru, o si ihe ozo ka o kwuso ya (When one thing stands, it implores
another to stand beside it). You see; we are giving other permutations to the
proverb. What stands implicitly invites a besideness. Besideness clarifies it;
activates it!
That is to say that
things do not just stand; they ask for otherness, for besideness. Things
standing are terribly alone and desire companionship.
This issue of things
standing beside things is in agreement with the Igbo thinking that a naghi ano otu nga elele mmanwu (One
does not watch a masked performance from only one angle). In the first place,
it is even impossible to watch a performance that involves chasing and running
about, witnessing this or that fantastic display or skill, this or that
narrative of narratives happening once in a while, just from one spot! One
rooted at a spot in such a performance is either under an influence of charms,
or does not understand the performance.
The Igbo, I believe,
think of other possibilities. Life opens many different doors for us to peep
in. If one is a flutist like Unoka, Okonkwo’s father in Things Fall Apart, one
can also be a farmer, a hunter, physician, etc, so that if one engagement
fails, one falls back on the other. Also, there could be an interesting way
that knowledge in one fertilizes knowledge in another, helps it to flourish in
a significant way, It is in fact in the arena of knowledge that when one
stands, another stands beside it. Knowledges have ways of interacting and
invigorating one another.
Can you see that when
Ezeulu in Achebe’s Arrow of God sends
Oduche to be his eyes and ears in the coming Whiteman’s dispensation, he is not mistaken? He is acting in line with this ancient wisdom that one does not
watch a masked dance only from a spot, as well as the philosophy of besideness. Igbo (African) ways have to
stand beside the Western. Traditional Igbo religion has to think of standing
beside Christianity and with confidence, Ihe
kwuru, ihe akwuso ya!
Now, as descendants
of Oduche, how do we play our roles of being Ezeulu’s "eyes" and "ears"? Are we
busy thinking that only one thing should stand? Then, we are terribly prodigal
and need to be recalled, if possible. Is it an African idea and Western
counterpart? Leave them; they need to interact. When one says that it does not
need the other or cannot learn from the other, it is mistaken.
Comments